Picasso, Duchamp, Pollock, Warhol and Hirst at one time or other have been reviled in both the popular and academic press. Pause. This list summarizes the greatest achievements in art of the last 100 years. One could add others to the list too <\/em>\u2014 Matisse, Barnett Newman, Beuys, Richter <\/em>\u2014 but on the occasion of his intercontinental Spot Paintings show at all 11 Gagosian galleries, Hirst demands closer examination. Oh, yes he does <\/em>\u2014 read on!<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n How many paintings are there altogether?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n It does not matter. There are some 300 works in the exhibition, over 1,400 in existence, and a million-dot painting is in production. (1) But how many paintings or dots there are is irrelevant. Hirst developed rules for painting the dots. Philosophically, one could follow those rules and keep producing the spot paintings indefinitely and independently of Hirst until they covered the earth and outnumbered the stars. John Lennon meets Borges. So think of them as one single work, repeatable, expandable, and infinite.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Like a disease!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Yes, like a disease. Hirst\u2019s art is about mortality and communication. The dots are just a vehicle for communicating the idea, like a virus or the hatchling that attaches to John Hurt\u2019s face in Ridley Scott\u2019s film Alien<\/em>. The art is in your head. Life is a terminal disease spread by communication, whether sexual, social, political, or pharmaceutical.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Rubbish. This is just pretentious hogwash, like the pharmaceutical-inspired titles to the paintings.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Did I emphasize that it is already in your head? You are infected now. Nothing you can do. But the titles are important \u2014 Hirst is a conceptual artist, so they are particularly important. These drugs represent every aspect of life \u2014 birth, reproduction, entertainment, prolongation \u2014 and also the sum of our fears. This is the dark side to the relentless happiness the paintings reflect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But isn\u2019t it just wallpaper?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n It is also wallpaper but also many other things. So are Michelangelo\u2019s frescoes. Calling something \u201cjust wallpaper\u201d is not serious examination but a device to avoid it. Just substitute any of the following adjectives: monstrous, evil, gorgeous, super.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A ridiculous comparison!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Bathetic, not ridiculous.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cI believe that after Jackson Pollock created a distance between the brush and the canvas by flinging the paint, there was nowhere to go with painting\u2026 The urge to be a painter is still there even if the process of painting is meaningless, old-fashioned. Today there are better ways to communicate to an audience raised on television, advertising and information on a global level.<\/em>\u201d (2)<\/p>\n\n\n\n He\u2019s right. Why is it that we still want to paint? And note, he doesn\u2019t say that \u201cpainting\u201d is meaningless but that the \u201cprocess\u201d is. This is about the media of paint, a tool for communication.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But Hirst doesn\u2019t even paint them himself!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Why should he? He\u2019s developed perfectly clear rules as to how the paintings should be produced \u2022 Each spot must be a different color \u2013 disharmony (the human paradox \u2014 everyone is identically different).<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 The colors must be distributed randomly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n […Of course the rules are often broke(n) <\/em>\u2014 the separations bigger than required, and as for random distribution of color, difficult to achieve without a prescribed system, which, of course, ushers in choice once more… viz. Eno’s cards (swapping the instruments for Bowie’s “Boys Keep Swinging”).]<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Hang on, who\u2019s he?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n That\u2019s Ge Si Di. Don\u2019t worry, he\u2019s always butting in. Anyway, as the exhibitions demonstrate, the size and shape of the paintings may vary infinitely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A glib little game!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Not at all. We are surrounded and governed by \u201cmeaningless\u201d rules. Every painting is identical and every painting is different. Does the metaphor ring a bell? It sounds trite until one adds interchangeable and reproducible, and then it\u2019s sinister. Your aesthetic taste has been manufactured. It is not a gift from god but a product of genetics and socialization. It is not original.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He doesn\u2019t even paint them himself.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The first few Hirst did himself but he thinks the latter versions are better. In fact, he has said that Rachel Howard painted the best Spot Paintings. (3)<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cI only ever made [sic] five spot paintings myself\u2026 and my spots I painted are shite.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n [GSD <\/em>\u2014 The early paintings by Hirst himself are better.]<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n (Who asked you anyway?) The dots are unoriginal. Lots of artists have done dots since Seurat.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Your observations are so original. There are huge numbers of different dot paintings by different artists. Personally I like John Armleder\u2019s very much. They are not the same as Hirst\u2019s, which in some senses actually have nothing to do with painting (but I\u2019m getting ahead of myself \u2014 more on that shortly). Yayoi Kusama also explores the relationship between sculpture, color, form and spotted surfaces. In fact, Hirst is a fan of Kusama. See for instance Hirst\u2019s interview of Kusama in the catalog to her \u201cNow\u201d exhibition in 1998 at Robert Miller Gallery, New York. (4) But you haven\u2019t been paying attention. The dots are not meant to be original but are about the impossibility of \u201coriginality\u201d that art, and more generally human culture itself, has achieved \u2014 not \u201creached\u201d but \u201cachieved.\u201d Culture, far from lineal \u2014 always a suspect notion \u2014 turns out to be molecular and frequently random.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I could paint them myself!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n You could, particularly if you bought \u201cPainting-By-Numbers\u201d (2001), a DIY spot painting kit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I think I\u2019m going to vomit.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Catharsis is good, but maybe wait for Hirst\u2019s Tate Modern retrospective this year. \u201cA Thousand Years\u201d (a vitrine with maggots and flies feeding off a cow\u2019s head, 1991) will help you. (5) But your comment brings me back to Pollock, who famously worked \u201cin\u201d the painting, producing what became known as the \u201call-over\u201d effect. Being \u201cin the painting\u201d emphasized the sculptural architecture of painting. On the one side the spot paintings are a mise-en-abyme, a paradox of infinite superficiality and possibility. On the other, they are background to the mise-en-scene. The art happens right where you\u2019re standing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThey have nothing to do with Richter or Larry Poons or Bridget Riley or Josef Albers or even Op Art. They\u2019re about the urge or the need to be a painter above and beyond the object of a painting. I\u2019ve often said that they are like sculptures of paintings.<\/em>\u201d (6)<\/p>\n\n\n\n That last sentence initially appears to be a non sequitur<\/em>\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n Oh for <\/strong>@#$%<\/strong>\u2019s sake!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2026but only if you think of the Spot Paintings<\/em> as flat images on a computer screen or in a magazine. They hang in space (like all paintings) and have been made consciously, by an artist who is principally a conceptual sculptor\/installation artist. As many images of the exhibitions attest, frequently the experience of these paintings, some of which are huge, involves other people in the foreground. This happens with paintings all the time but normally it goes unnoticed unless you\u2019re craning your head for an oblique glimpse of the Mona Lisa. Hirst makes it a central theme, the friction between painting and viewer as object.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ooh, move over Descartes! Step up, Mr Hirst! Take your place in the Pantheon!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n His is not a critical synthesis of certain tenets of Cubism, Formalism, Dada, Abstract Expressionism, Color Field, Op Art, Pop, Conceptual Art and Post-Modernism, but a seductively and calculatedly bland one. All art ends up as decoration. He makes you feel good about nihilism. This is critical, not cynical. The warming ambrosia is laced with strychnine (which, by the way, has sometimes been used as a stimulant). Pharmaceuticals can be poisonous.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And this is art criticism.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Yes, it is! (smile)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Shoot me now.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Funny you should say that. Hirst\u2019s extensive private collection, which will open to the public soon at the converted Toddington Manor in England, is called the \u201cmurderme collection.\u201d As well as works by Francis Bacon and Jeff Koons and many of his British contemporaries, Hirst also collects a lot of work by young artists. It\u2019s in the country, a bit like in the video he directed for Blur\u2019s \u201cCountry House<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n But I digress, the critical element concerns Warhol\u2019s and Benjamin\u2019s pet itch \u2014<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2026Benjiwho?!\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Benjamin, Walter Benjamin. And the other guy is Warhol, Andy\u2026 anyway, as I was saying, reproduction, reproducibility \u2014 because sex and copying have stuff in common \u2014 agency, originality, production, consumption, really all the big themes in art of the past century, are tied up, emblematized, criticized, exploited and indulged in Hirst\u2019s spots paintings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sounds fun.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Well, art is entertainment \u2014 Koons, Murakami, Duchamp and Picasso would all agree, but then so would Klimt too, and he just made art for chocolate boxes. Sometimes art is meant to make you happy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See, it\u2019s a joke.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Didn\u2019t you see that parenthetical smile (above)? It is a joke! That\u2019s part of its attractive vertigo. The chutzpah of putting on a show of 300 paintings of spots in 11 galleries across three continents is also a joke, a very funny one. Whatever you say, they are just superficial.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n You\u2019re on fire today. All painting is superficial. That is what painting is. Go back and read from the top.<\/p>\n\n\n\n [GSD <\/em>\u2014 The whole business brings us back to painting <\/em>\u2014 which I guess is the point rather than a negation of painting or a requiem for painting.]<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n You\u2019re both just being provocative. The spot paintings are boring.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Quite. Provocatively boring. Boring things surrounds us \u2014 it\u2019s part of life, so why shouldn\u2019t it be an important part of our art?<\/p>\n\n\n\n I\u2019m not having any of it! This is just excessive and egotistical!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Clearly you don\u2019t know many artists. As Oscar Wilde said, \u201cModeration is a fatal thing\u2026 Nothing succeeds like excess.\u201d The Complete Spot Paintings<\/em> is intended to be excessive. It is, among other things, about excess. And this excess reflects the excess in ordinary life that we take for granted, including regarding sex, food, laws, cars, legal and illegal drugs, violence, oil, waste, diamonds, forest-clearing, air-travel\u2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n How arrogant!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Hirst does not force people to buy his art or to visit his exhibitions or to read about him, or to do anything they don\u2019t want to. What\u2019s your problem?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well, I prefer real paintings like Lucien Freud\u2019s.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Well that is a problem but I can\u2019t help you, though a shot of adrenalin might. Or LSD. Frankly anything to make them interesting and stop your blood pressure dropping dangerously low. I\u2019m sure something can be found for you in one of Hirst\u2019s titles. What do you mean by \u201creal paintings\u201d anyway? Everything Freud had to say, was said decades earlier by another English introvert, Stanley Spencer. (I hope you\u2019re paying attention here too, Jenny Saville.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Next you\u2019ll be saying that Hirst\u2019s paintings at the Wallace Collection are good.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The artwork is good: appropriation of a traditional museum and artists. Unique.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Just a moment, Randian is about art and China <\/strong>\u2014 what\u2019s the connection?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n You mean apart from the exhibition including Hong Kong? Well, an interesting connection is the British abstract painter John Hoyland, who died in July 2011. Hirst admired Hoyland and even interviewed him for the Royal Academy in London. Among Hoyland\u2019s umpteen influences was a voracious interest in Chinese painting. (7) Otherwise I\u2019m struggling. Oh, and Rachel Howard\u2019s recent works look a bit Literati-ish.<\/p>\n\n\n\n What a joke! I am really NOT convinced!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n You don\u2019t want to be. But whatever \u2014 I don\u2019t care what you don\u2019t think. Everything will be the same, a thousand years hence. (8)<\/p>\n\n\n\n [GSD <\/em>\u2014 One could of course subtend the whole thing and just paint. It’s a culturally specific complaint <\/em>\u2014 post-modernist disappointment. A malady from which others do not suffer.]<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n @#$%off!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Hirst says that too. Frequently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/strong>1. Leon Watson, \u201cSpot the difference: Damien Hirst painted only FIVE of the 300 spot paintings in his latest collection,\u201d The Daily Mail<\/em>, January 13, 2012.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2. Damien Hirst, \u201cOn Dumb Painting,\u201d originally published in I Want to Spend the Rest of My Life Everywhere, with Everyone, One to One, Always, Forever, Now.<\/em> (London: Booth-Clibborn Editions, 1997).<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3. Gordon Burn and Damien Hirst, On the way to work<\/em> (London: Faber and Faber, 2001).<\/p>\n\n\n\n 4. Damien Hirst, \u201cDamien Hirst Questions Yayoi Kusama across the water, May 1998\u201d in \u201cYayoi Kusama. Now,\u201d June 11\u2013August 7, 1998, Ex. Cat., (Robert Miller Gallery: New York, 1998). This exhibition coincided with a retrospective exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art, the culmination of the resurrection of her career that had begun with in 1989 with a retrospective at New York\u2019s Center for International Contemporary Arts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 5. Incidentally, it was the first work Hirst sold to Charles Saatchi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6. Hirst, \u201cOn Dumb Painting\u201d, op cit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 7. \u201cHoyland and Hirst,\u201d RA Magazine<\/em> (Autumn 2009). Republished on Royal Academy website, \u201cRoyal Academy Blog: Hoyland and Hirst\u201d (August 2, 2011).<\/p>\n\n\n\n 8. A reference to Satan being thrown into the bottomless pit at the end of time for a thousand years (indeed, contradictions in terms are a particular strength of the Bible) but not such a bad fate compared with that of Sisyphus. Obviously this is also the source of Hirst\u2019s \u201cA Thousand Years.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Quote at beginning of article \u2014<\/p>\n\n\n\n You do not like them.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n So you say.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Try them! Try them!<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n And you may.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Try them and you may, I say!<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Dr. Suess. \u201cSam-I-am,\u201d in Dr. Seuss\u2019s Green Eggs and Ham<\/em> (New York: Beginner Books, 1960).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" You do not like them. So you say. Try th … Continue reading ![\"\"](\"https:\/\/randian-art.s3.ap-east-1.amazonaws.com\/2023\/09\/zh-hant\/image-204.png\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.randian-online.com\/wp-includes\/js\/tinymce\/plugins\/wordpress\/img\/trans.gif\" "\\"Next"){kind=spacer}
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/randian-art.s3.ap-east-1.amazonaws.com\/2023\/09\/zh-hant\/image-205.png\")
\u2022 In any one painting, all the spots must be the same size.
\u2022 The distance between the spots must be the same as the spots themselves \u2014 harmony (a grid).<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/randian-art.s3.ap-east-1.amazonaws.com\/2023\/09\/zh-hant\/image-206.png\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/randian-art.s3.ap-east-1.amazonaws.com\/2023\/09\/zh-hant\/image-207.png\")
![\":-)\"](\"https:\/\/www.randian-online.com\/wp-includes\/images\/smilies\/icon_smile.gif\"){kind=icon}
<\/p>\n\n\n\nENDNOTES:<\/p>\n\n\n\n